Zese are ze vurst fake ahk-cents you vill ever hair. Unt zee vurst ehk-tink you vill evair see.
It's claptrap to excuse this 1932 dreck as "primitive" in style. Here are some other terrific films released that same year: "A Bill of Divorcement," "Blonde Venus," "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," "Freaks," "Grand Hotel," "I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang," "The Old Dark House," "Red Dust," "Shanghai Express," etc.
The apologetic idea that this pitiful script, virtually stationary camera and abominable acting are somehow to be excused because it was "only" 1932 doesn't hold up for one second. Even silent film acting had advanced WAY beyond this.
The "sets" are matte paintings. Want to see some spectacular "sets," mattes and effects work? Try 1927's silent "Ben-Hur" for brilliance.
I'm a Lugosi fan, without forgetting that his range as an actor was extremely limited; far more limited than Boris Karloff's.
This is undoubtedly Lugosi's weakest work. The "supporting" cast are your worst nightmare of amateur community theatre.
It is also NOT a Universal picture, as some comments mistakenly have it. It is a "Halperin" picture released by United Artists.
Better it had remained "lost," so it might have retained some imagined "legendary" status.
As it is, it simply exists as proof that every era of cinema has its own Ed Wood (in this case, the Halperin brothers).
Already 49 when he made "Dracula," (he was born in 1882), Lugosi had been banging around Hollywood since 1920, when he appeared as an uncredited Indian in "The Last of the Mohicans." "Dracula" was his 43rd film, including his European silents.
Many, many actors reached the epitome of acting skill during the silents (Lillian Gish, Greta Garbo, the Barrymores, Lon Chaney, Wallace Beery, Gloria Swanson and Janet Gaynor, to mention a few).
Lugosi never did.
Frankly, I wish I'd never seen this, since it drives the final stake through the heart of any notion that Bela Lugosi was a "great" actor. He was fine in his narrow range of "specialty" material, but could never escape or expand that range. His playing was as melodramatic in his last picture ("The Black Sleep") as it had always been.
I'm grateful he got lucky with the stage and film productions of "Dracula," the role he was born to play.
Sadly, "White Zombie" desecrates even his performance in his signature role.