Toronto, 1989. Leslie and Reuben were inseparable best friends until a toxic lifestyle tore them apart. Now, when their city is overrun by a wild new drug, they're forced to reunite and infiltrate a deadly underground game to stay alive.
More
5.6 /10
122 people rated
Going In
2023
R
1 h 37 m
Kanada
Tindakan
Kejahatan
Drama
Toronto, 1989. Leslie and Reuben were inseparable best friends until a toxic lifestyle tore them apart. Now, when their city is overrun by a wild new drug, they're forced to reunite and infiltrate a deadly underground game to stay alive.
More
5.6 /10
122 people rated
Tonton online
Tonton di app
Episode
Pemeran Terbaik
Ulasan Pengguna
Episode
Pemeran Terbaik
Ulasan Pengguna
Episode
film
lklk
Netflix
Plex
Pemeran Utama(18)
Ira Goldman
Reuben
Evan Rissi
Leslie
Victor D.S. Man
Feng
Chanelle Luu
Nora
David John Phillips
The Announcer
William Dao
Tiger
Scotty Murray
Caleb
Alan Shane Lewis
X
Michelle Nash
Marnie
Lorenz Banlawi
Elfrid
Lineen Doung
Kenny
Fallon Bowman
Reporter Erica
Chris Peterson
The Mayor
Neil Bennett
Police Inspector
Rikki Wright
Finn
Justin Tran
Ju-Long
Ryan Dennee
Spidah
Sandy Chen
Tiger's Mother
Ulasan Pengguna
Alex Rendell
25/07/2025 06:10
Talent and entertainment packed into a visually epic depiction of the late 80s. Great soundtrack to complement the aesthetics and story line. Character development follows the unique screenplay to keep viewers entertained all the way through. Flashback to classic 80s action with many clever twists. Classic cars, authentic costume design, witty humour, much needed street hoops and squash...
Topped off with a great ending and an overall awesome theme that did not disappoint. Imaginably difficult if this was all on a strict budget but the talent pulled it off.
Toronto is back on the map cinematically!!!!!!!!
Basabaty Coulibaly
17/01/2024 16:01
source: Going In
Jonathan Morningstar
17/01/2024 16:01
At the movie's intro, the viewer is taken into the world of late 80s Toronto... or what, at least, we're told it is. The plot starts very on the nose of the aesthetics of the late 80s with the characters integrating as they should; living their existences. Then, with the introduction/ reuniting of the two leads aided with alcohol, we see that this world slowly unwinds and descends into absurdity.
The movie is delivered straight the entire time - through its performances/conviction - where we still might not know what's intended by the director. Is this on purpose? Do we know if it's a form of satire? Do we know if it could also be totally straight? Do we know why it's... ambiguous on purpose? The characters (and even actors) certainly don't, and that decision swollenly builds from beginning to climax, then through til the very end. For some reason this didn't waver my attention: only sharpened it.
After seeing it, my summation is this: To start, the writer was dead set on it being funny, but in a more covert Trojan Horse type way. Secondly, the director shows us this world by its style, conviction, and musical score (oh my god that Tangerine Dream inspired synth) with both action thrills and spectacles. Finally, at the very end, the lead actor shoots off a cheap callback pun to let us all in on it: the 1980s were a total joke. Fitting that all of these three things were done by the same guy. Friggin LOL. Brilliant dick move.
— No more content —
Ulasan Pengguna
Alex Rendell
25/07/2025 06:10
Talent and entertainment packed into a visually epic depiction of the late 80s. Great soundtrack to complement the aesthetics and story line. Character development follows the unique screenplay to keep viewers entertained all the way through. Flashback to classic 80s action with many clever twists. Classic cars, authentic costume design, witty humour, much needed street hoops and squash...
Topped off with a great ending and an overall awesome theme that did not disappoint. Imaginably difficult if this was all on a strict budget but the talent pulled it off.
Toronto is back on the map cinematically!!!!!!!!
Basabaty Coulibaly
17/01/2024 16:01
source: Going In
Jonathan Morningstar
17/01/2024 16:01
At the movie's intro, the viewer is taken into the world of late 80s Toronto... or what, at least, we're told it is. The plot starts very on the nose of the aesthetics of the late 80s with the characters integrating as they should; living their existences. Then, with the introduction/ reuniting of the two leads aided with alcohol, we see that this world slowly unwinds and descends into absurdity.
The movie is delivered straight the entire time - through its performances/conviction - where we still might not know what's intended by the director. Is this on purpose? Do we know if it's a form of satire? Do we know if it could also be totally straight? Do we know why it's... ambiguous on purpose? The characters (and even actors) certainly don't, and that decision swollenly builds from beginning to climax, then through til the very end. For some reason this didn't waver my attention: only sharpened it.
After seeing it, my summation is this: To start, the writer was dead set on it being funny, but in a more covert Trojan Horse type way. Secondly, the director shows us this world by its style, conviction, and musical score (oh my god that Tangerine Dream inspired synth) with both action thrills and spectacles. Finally, at the very end, the lead actor shoots off a cheap callback pun to let us all in on it: the 1980s were a total joke. Fitting that all of these three things were done by the same guy. Friggin LOL. Brilliant dick move.
— No more content —
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on MovieBox are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.