Crow

So where is the movie, the entertainment, the horror, the story? This is boring and empty.

A very good movie for all those interested in nature and how to protect it , in some interesting ways *cough ! A crazy and strange movie with good presentation and does well with its small budget!

These days, much fiction takes it upon itself to preach to us about one thing or another. Sometimes we agree with what is being said, other times, not. 'Crow' is described as an eco-horror and the balance between the two is finely tuned. Wyndham Price has co-written a fine script, by turns wistful, mesmeric, spiritual and an unsettling warning about what might happen if you mess with things better left alone. Alicia (Elen Rhys) is our most sympathetic character - ignored and treated as the trophy wife she initially seems to be. I found this film great fun, and extremely well directed by Price. Only the depiction of the forest itself is an issue - it's too clean and laundered. Crow and his tribe would, you imagine, be living in fuller, more unkempt greenery befitting the nature of the story. Other than that, my score is 8 out of 10.

I don't usually watch "horror", but having read previews - it indicated that this had much more substance. I'm so glad I did, it most certainly captured my attention throughout. The theme based on the protection of the environment, local folklore and the conflict between "lay people" and an obnoxious, inconsiderate property developer may have been used before, but not like this. Atmospheric elements are cleverly introduced to tantalize and maintain your interest throughout. I found the mythology and ritualism enthralling, I found myself easily relating to them, wondering how they will affect the final outcome. It has been excellently directed by Wyndham Price, it has an appropriate pace, some great ideas, a superb atmospheric feel and it easily "pulls you in". Actors: The cast have been wonderfully chosen, I found their performances captivating, everyone's contribution enhancing what can only be described as a couple of hours pleasure. I recommend you watch this, I honestly believe that this could gain cult status.

I'm not sure what the point of this movie was? Are we supposed to side with the hippie druids? If so then it failed miserably. Firstly the squatters, does anyone actually think they should have any rights? Apart from other squatters of course. Despite things later on revealed they are still trespassers and hence get no sympathy from the audience. The main posh Brit is a douche-bag, no denying that but that doesn't excuse some tree worshiping nutters killing and maiming people. It sadly paints every character as unlikable, the hippies coming off the worst. The voice of the Crow character is so annoying I was already hating the movie before anything happened. Which is another point...nothing really happens throughout the film, it is mainly just nonsense voice-overs (what a waste of talent!) The acting in itself is fine but with such irritating characters they didn't have much to work with. All in all there is nothing to like in this film and I was rooting more for the main guy, despite the film desperately trying to paint him as the bad guy.

Its got a good set up, it's got a good sound rack, the acting's pretty decent. Even the atmosphere is good in some places, its just not scary. Also, I might be wrong here but I think they accidentally brought in Irish mythology to explain the creepy woodland and I think the film is set in Whales? So that was a little confusing It wants to be the Hallow. It is not the Hallow. However there are much worse ways to spend an evening.

There is not an awful lot to add to what has already been said by the previous negative reviews, but will offer my two cents anyway. Did not watch 'Crow' intending to hate it or with initial prejudice, actually wanted to like it as it did sound somewhat interesting, even if not exactly original. Personally do not mind if something is not original, as long as it engages me and has enough to allow me to keep watching. As well as not having anything that distracts or annoys. 'Crow' however completely fails in the former and has a lot of the latter. It had an interesting cast, do like Terrence Stamp in other things for example, but it is completely uninteresting elsewhere. Will do some elaborating later on in the review, but there are irritating elements such as characters not worth rooting for, and one hates the way they behave and over-used narration, and the pace never rises above flat. While not having anywhere near enough horror to horrify and lacking in surprises and suspense to scare. It is not a completely irredeemable film. The cast do okay with what they behave, especially Tom Rhys Harries trying his utmost hardest to make the titular character menacing and vulnerable but needed much better material to work with. Visuals generally are reasonably good, with some nice photography that evokes an eeriness. Unfortunately, a lot brings 'Crow' down. The script is far too sedate, too literal and stagy, with scenes feeling like melodramatic monologues but excessively drawn-out and self-indulgent almost. The narration features too much, is often not needed and in this aspect the film really could have done with more show and less tell. None of the characters engage and none of them are worth rooting for, Tucker is far too over-the-top as a character and it is like watching a cartoon. The way they behave too induces a lot of face palming, just silly and sometimes illogical. A big problem too other than the dialogue and the lack of real horror is the out of place and excessive lecturing, which certainly gets its point across but beats the viewer around the head with it. Enough of talking about the things that annoyed me, and talk about why the horror didn't work. One of the biggest issues is that 'Crow' had too much emphasis on the drama, which failed because it frustrated and felt like overwrought melodrama, and the horror is nearly neglected. Another big issue is the pace, which is flat as can be and is far too slow as a result of overlong scenes and too much talk. When the horror did feature, it never shocked me and had such a been-there-done-that feel to it with its complete lack of surprises. There is no tension and even less suspense, with build ups being far too obvious, the special effects being jarringly poor, the scares being too few and repetitive and there never is a sense of threat, again because the dramatic aspects get in the way as does the lecturing. The music is so unmemorable that it nearly got forgotten about writing the review. 'Crow' takes itself far too seriously and actually would not have minded a little humour and levity to break things up a little. Overall, interesting cast and idea, uninteresting execution. 3/10

Minor plot spoiler. Crow is the name of a Druid tribe that dates to ancient times. They are squatters at a farmhouse and on land that was recently acquired by Tucker (Nick Moran) who wants to build a dream house deep in the woods, cutting down quite a bit of forest. He also is forcing the tribe of squatters out, squatters who refuse to leave. A confrontation happens that eventually invokes the forest spirits. Tom Rhys Harries becomes the title character. Terence Stamp has a role I would expect for Christopher Lee. The film was better than my expectations. Some violence, blood, and gore. F-word. No nudity.

Moviecut—Crow

source: Crow