The seven sisters of the outcast LeFleur family try to survive in a post-Civil War Deep South.
More
4.4 /10
181 people rated
House of Seven Belles
1979
R
1 h 32 m
संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका
ड्रामा
हॉरर
The seven sisters of the outcast LeFleur family try to survive in a post-Civil War Deep South.
More
4.4 /10
181 people rated
ऑनलाइन देखें
ऐप में देखें
एपिसोड
शीर्ष कलाकार
उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षा
एपिसोड
शीर्ष कलाकार
उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षा
एपिसोड
film
lklk
Netflix
Plex
शीर्ष कलाकार(7)
Dolores Barcia
Aunt Alice
Peter Barcia
Jonathan Harker
Elaine Boies
Victoria
Hal Borske
Judd
Joe Downing
Willy
Randa Kriss
Daisy Mae
Louise Schiumo
Violet
उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षा
Miss Jey Arts
29/05/2023 07:19
source: House of Seven Belles
Iammohofficial
25/05/2023 11:34
Moviecut—House of Seven Belles
TextingStory
23/05/2023 03:13
Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity.
He sucks.
This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it?
Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level.
Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.
Rishi Cholera
23/05/2023 03:13
Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.
Ada SALIOU
29/03/2023 16:04
Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity.
He sucks.
This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it?
Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level.
Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.
user9755029206812
23/03/2023 16:02
source: House of Seven Belles
Lolitaps Pianke
23/03/2023 16:02
Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.
— No more content —
उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षा
Miss Jey Arts
29/05/2023 07:19
source: House of Seven Belles
Iammohofficial
25/05/2023 11:34
Moviecut—House of Seven Belles
TextingStory
23/05/2023 03:13
Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity.
He sucks.
This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it?
Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level.
Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.
Rishi Cholera
23/05/2023 03:13
Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.
Ada SALIOU
29/03/2023 16:04
Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity.
He sucks.
This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it?
Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level.
Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.
user9755029206812
23/03/2023 16:02
source: House of Seven Belles
Lolitaps Pianke
23/03/2023 16:02
Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.
— No more content —
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on MovieBox are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.