Dear viewers: the makers of Youth in Revolt would like you to know that they really want you to like their movie. They're willing to do whatever it takes. They'll give you juvenile sex jokes, partial nudity (but nothing too raunchy that might offend somebody and lose a vote), explosions, they'll give you names of philosophers, hints of sophisticated subtext, references to classic literature and quirky animation sequences, they'll hire top character actors and give them absolutely nothing interesting to do.
Youth in Revolt tries so hard to appeal to everybody that it loses itself along the way. It vies to be the darling of indie-loving hipsters and hormone-addled adolescents at the same time, or in other words it tries to appeal to the Juno crowd and the American Pie crowd, but it doesn't manage to feel as quirkily likable as Juno or even the lesser 500 Days of Summer; it's also far too dark to fit in that category. For a run-of-the-mill teen sex comedy, on the other hand, the dialog, very clearly meant to tell the viewer that it's an intelligent movie for intelligent people, but clearly written with a thesaurus close at hand, feels clumsy and out of place. It doesn't help that most of the actors, Portia Doubleday most of all, clearly have no idea what the names and words they're saying actually mean. The film, in fact, stands out as one of the worst cases of bad line delivery I've seen in a while, which is jarring in a movie that evidently has a decent budget and high production values.
The acting is a real waste too. Michael Cera has been playing the same character for nearly a decade now, and he generally gets away with it, mainly because he's adorably awkward enough to make the characters likable. It doesn't work this time, though; Nick comes off as en egotistical, whiny hypocrite who gets no love from the audience, and when he's playing his alter ego 'Francois' - well, let's say I'm starting to doubt that the kid has as much potential as I once thought he did. Cera doesn't take a lesson from Peter Sellers, Kevin Kline, Christian Bale, hell, even Jerry Lewis - all of whom played multiple characters in one movie and made it work. Nick is Michael Cera playing himself, Francois is Michael Cera playing himself pretending to be someone else, poorly. And while Nick is hypocritical and annoying, Portia Doubleday's character is spoiled, manipulative and deserves everything that happens to her. It's really a bad sign when you're watching a romantic comedy and rooting for the protagonists to not end up together.
On top of which you have a bunch of excellent character actors and indie darlings who go to complete waste. Zach Galifianakis isn't funny, Steve Buscemi is bland and dry, Ray Liotta does nothing and M. Emmet Walsh clearly has no idea what he's doing there. The best acting in the whole movie comes from Fred Willard, all two minutes of it, which is a shame because his character had more promise than anything else in a movie.
I guess a lot of people enjoyed this movie, and there's no accounting for taste, but in my opinion Youth in Revolt was so manipulative and pathetic that a couple of funny moments and a professional production weren't nearly enough to make me glad I spent 90 minutes on it.