moviebox header nav
moviebox search icon
muted

Sous haute surveillance

2018

R

1 h 26 m

Canada

Crime

Mystère

Thriller

A couple moves to an isolated, modern, safe apartment building with CCTV after the wife has problems with nightmares. However, something's not quite right with the building.
More

4.4 /10

9004 people rated

Regarder en ligne

Dans l’appli

Épisodes

Meilleurs acteurs

Avis des utilisateurs

Épisodes
Meilleurs acteurs
Avis des utilisateurs

Épisodes

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex
Meilleurs acteurs(18)
starring avatar
Christina Ricci
Lauren Curran
starring avatar
Brendan Fletcher
Russell Curran
starring avatar
Vicellous Shannon
Phillip Starks
starring avatar
John Cusack
Vernon Sarsfield
starring avatar
Nicole Anthony
Margo Ingram
starring avatar
Oliver Rice
Lance Geyer
default avatar
Gigi Jackman
Beatrice Landry
default avatar
Benjamin DeWalt
Ryan
default avatar
Maja Milkovich
Dominique
starring avatar
Scott Olynek
Tim Hoyle
starring avatar
Angela Quinn
Ephrina
starring avatar
Sophia Daly
Ali Ingram
starring avatar
Barry Nerling
Razor-Cut Man
default avatar
Robert Fraser
Paramedic
starring avatar
Julia Maxwell
Gwendolyn Serota-Talal
starring avatar
Matt Brown
Scott Ingram
starring avatar
Zan Klein
Food Truck Chef
default avatar
Alvin Tam
Intruder

Avis des utilisateurs

author avatar

🌈🦋Modesta🧚🏼‍♀️✨

24/07/2025 07:30
If there is a movie that is not convincing, this is one of them. I am a little surprised at Ricci being in this, and not surprised that Cusack is. What ever happened to Cusack, are these the only parts on offer to him these days? The movie starts off OK, then folds beneath your eyes. In fact, I was laughing from when Cusack entered the scene. I am blaming the director and editing on this. He is just terrible. The scenes with him are trying to empasise intrigue and mystery and ended up a shambles. Really, I can't say much more, becasue in reality, the movie dosen't deserve it. I'm giving 5 stars for Ricci's sake.
author avatar

Olamide Adedeji

29/05/2023 16:20
source: Distorted
author avatar

musa

22/11/2022 16:49
DISTORTED is a lamentably bad thriller that goes for the psychological approach but turns out to be a complete waste of time for viewers. A tired-looking Christina Ricci plays a wife who moves into a high tech building only to become convinced that she's being stalked and spied on by strangers. It's embarrassingly low budget throughout, and the worst thing is that the supposed scare sequences rely on flashing images seemingly designed to induce an epileptic fit in the viewer. I had my suspicions when I saw Brendan Fletcher's name in the cast - he's forever soured by his association with Uwe Boll - and as for John Cusack, he appears in little more than an extended cameo. Bad stuff indeed, even by B-flick standards.
author avatar

Baba Bocoum

22/11/2022 16:49
Who cares about dialogue! Not that it mattered in this film since it was so inanely stupid. Fortunately, there were no subtitles; poor audio level control; poor enunciation by actors(?). Other signs of bad: Scenes of people in car driving on road - cheap filler; background music/sound effects annoyingly blatant & used as crutch for boring nothing going on scenes; scenes of apartment building in which clouds in background do not move. Script: Nothing creative in this redux of mind control through subliminal tele messages, and droning sound. (Here are some of the subliminal's - failure, transgressor, flawed, worthless, weak, broken, obey, eliminate, assassinate, kill, all interspersed w/death images). Stupid predictable ending.
author avatar

Hama9a🤪🤪فكاهة😜

22/11/2022 16:49
Oh dear what has happened with John constantly doing terrible movies, and any movie that disguises terrible scenes behind excessive flashing lights is a no no.
author avatar

waren

22/11/2022 16:49
The movie had a semi original plot ,, i really had high hopes for it ,, seeing Christina Ricci out there ... but still even with a surprising twist at the end ,, the movie didn't really deliver and in short was not good ... at all . Christina Ricci did a fine job, even John Cusack gave me a glims of hope but the script was way off .. and was so disconnected .. had a lot of gaps even with all of these flashbacks and distorted images which were suppose to highlight the thrill element ..all were just a blank shots. Final though ,, i think one of the main problems is Arne Olsen was away from writing for almost 8 years so he did not really rise to the occasion and trying to patch it up with Rob King directing didn't do much help... Not recommended-.
author avatar

Ninhoette ❤️🦍

22/11/2022 16:49
This film tells the story of a woman who is paranoid of her new home. The film starts off mysterious and suspenseful, but as time goes on it becomes more unbelievable. The ending even becomes ridiculous and far fetched. The constant quick flashes of unnerving scenes got to me as well, and I often had to close my eyes for fear of taking in to much negativity. It is a sub-par B movie, and I feel sorry that Christina Ricci is in it.
author avatar

Rupa Karki

22/11/2022 16:49
The directing was the most redeeming part of this film. The concept was interesting but failed to deliver within the screenplay, particularly with it's slow pace, dragged out scenes, and convoluted plot issues. The constant depressing score created more aggravation than suspense. The characters were very bland, stale and robotic. John Cusack's character was overly sketchy and detracted form the overall film. His character would have been better cast with another actor. Had the producers chosen to tweak/edit the final cut, it could have shown better and perhaps held the viewers attention. I feel this film had potential, but the end result was distorted. It's a 6/10 from me.
author avatar

Puneet Motwani

22/11/2022 16:49
This movie just doesn't work. You will find yourself fast-forwarding through it, hoping for a scene with some action or meaning. There is no such scene. Just some mindless psycho-babble. Christina Ricci is lifeless and depressing. John Cusack's character is a caricature and a fool. And that condominium building is low-budget animation; a silly drawing. Rating 1 star, because IMDb doesn't give the option of Zero stars.
author avatar

Afã da liloca2401348

22/11/2022 16:49
The description looked intriguing but it didn't live up to the expectation. I was mostly bored and the story wasn't interesting. It started slow and didn't explain things like why everyone scratched their neck or the significance of "Beautiful Dreamer" playing a lot.
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on MovieBox are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.