Section 8

I watched Section 8 yesterday.and with all honesty I can't remember anything outstanding about the movie besides how rough Mickey Rourke looks. The storyline plays out from one generic paperback trope to the next, Rourke and Lundgren have supporting cameos that add old A-listers names to bolster the casting list. Section 8 is the second.2022 movie.that I have watched recently.with Dermot Mulroney in the leading role Just as in Agent Game. (Mel Gibson supporting ) Mulroney.acts up a storm as he is bundled along in an otherwise.unexceptional plot. Sorry guys its a two star movie that passes some time.

Section 8 delivers great action and intense beats throughout its runtime. Characters gel well together, BTS crew have done an exceptional job in delivering what the fan base want as well as catering to the majority of cinema goers. Its nice to see the movie have its release theatrically for those who want to attend the theatre and its great for those who just wanna stay in bed and be comfortable. Overall a great action pictures with elements of all your favourite movies wrapped into one. Definitely worth a watch in my opinion. Grab a beer (or glass of wine) and enjoy this thrill ride of a movie.

It's always a pleasure to see Dolph Lundgren and Scott Adkins work. But the director and producers seem to have banked this gig solely on the star-status of these two guys (and on the shooting-star-status of the venerable Mickey Rourke) and just couldn't give a s**t about the most basic physical and social reality of the world around them (the opening scene, an ambush in a village in Afghanistan, says it all... nobody in their right minds would act like supposed "spec ops" soldiers act, not even a child would act in such a reckless way)... anyway, if you give that a pass, and if you fast-forward through the boring scenes (a good final cut could safely cut off at least 30 minutes), well... then you're left with a decent (although 110% predictable) action movie. I would advise the director to find another job, because this is for sure not his calling. Either that, or he should not leave the editing room before the final cut. And I would advise "producers" to not meddle in the nitty-gritty of movie making if their only forte is supplying cold hard cash.

I did not know that good actors such as Dermot could become so bad. The only reason I gave it 2 stars is becuase of Dermot. The acting, the lines, the characters were so bad, one might think they were high. This director should just leave the industry. Waste of potential talent. Can anyone tell me why would any of these reputable actors would take on this nonsensical "project" The fighting scenes were comical, you can see how the actors fight the air, I wasn't sure if thos is a comedy or a new genre. The dialogues was out of line. Rourke was just very hard to look at. If this was a satire than i give it thumbs up.

Hi, guys I am still watching the movie...if you noticed in the starting scene Mosul - Afghanistan shows up. I heard Mosul was in IRAQ correct me ? So I just was wondering how could such a mistake can happen. However it's not surprising. The movies I did not finish yet however it's interesting I am watching now. The brutal murder was so abrupt and immediate and the people who killed the family did not show any mercy and killed innocent family for no reason or may be frivolous reason. And right on the spot the hero took revenge and the villain was willing to be killed the story so far is a bit lagging but see it it could make sense later.

source: Section 8

The movie starts with an unrealistic scene that we're told is happening in Afghanistan, but Mossul is in Irak guys and there they speak Arabic yeah, not in Afghanistan. The plot is really an old cliché of the 90's maybe, nothing is realistic in the whole story. The killing scenes also were so imaginary, e.g the famous "Locke" can kill anyone with one shot but when it comes to our hero, he points the gun to him but fails many times. Poor screenplay and lack of new ideas were so clear. The end as well can't be worse, and please do not think of a part 2 as you may intend to do. This is not worth a try even if you've nothing to do, just look away you'll find something more interesting.

I could say this was a formulaic direct to video action flick with in house music that never seems to have any vocals. It's like they took one of those Steven Segal movies that have flooded streaming services and only played half of every scene. No joke, within 5 minutes the plot had already been introduced, played out, and transitioned to the final act. Justin Furstenfeld played an interesting character but like everything else we only got a glimpse of who he was. It was like watching a movie completely stoned except I was sober this time. If I smoked a bowl and rewatched it, I bet it would seem like a Taco Bell commercial.

Jake Atherton (Ryan Kwanten) served in Mosul with Colonel Mason (Dolph Lundgren). After they save each other's life, the film jumps to five years later with Jake working for his Uncle Earl (Mickey Rourke) at a body shop in Riverside, California. A group of gangbangers lead by Robert LaSardo try to shake them down to no avail. Jake's wife and son are killed and Jake goes vigilante "Death Wish" on the gang and goes to prison. While in prison he gets a bag over his head and is recruited by a group of government assassins called Section 8 but without the guys from "Basic." Yes, it would have been better with Samuel L. Jackson. He does a couple of jobs for them but hesitated on his last kill so Section 8 now wans to eliminate him calling in the big guy (Scott Adkins) to do the job. The movie goes one way and then another trying to hit every cliche. The acting looked bad because the script was bad. Guide: F-word. Brief sex. Uncredited * nudity.

End of movie i ask to my self why I take time for watch this movie ...............It's sad. This movie could have been a great movie if the director had spent more time on the plot and raised the budget. It is also a shame to mix well-known and successful actors together with actors who should not be seen behind the screen. The story itself is a very good but there is no context and everything goes quickly, very easily to figure out and we see clear budget effects that make the watcher ashamed. How can they even class it as a movie and get it to end up on imbd? Ryan was and is described as insecure in many scenes, but at the same time he was able to extinguish a homemade bomb among 10 colleagues around it without blinking an eye. It is contradictory and creates confusion. He could kill many heroes quickly but when he met scott it suddenly took a lot of time and he was close to losing the fight. I think they have skimped a bit too much in combination with poor choice of actors and pressured action that resulted in a failed rather than a watchable film.