A teenager accidentally activates a wristwatch that enables him to stop time.
More
5.2 /10
15670 people rated
Clockstoppers
2002
R
1 h 34 m
Estados Unidos
Aksyon
Pakikipagsapalaran
Komedya
A teenager accidentally activates a wristwatch that enables him to stop time.
More
5.2 /10
15670 people rated
Manood online
Manood sa app
Mga episode
Nangungunang Cast
Pagsusuri ng User
Mga episode
Nangungunang Cast
Pagsusuri ng User
Mga episode
film
lklk
Netflix
Plex
Nangungunang Cast(18)
Jesse Bradford
Zak Gibbs
French Stewart
Dr. Earl Dopler
Paula Garcés
Francesca
Michael Biehn
Henry Gates
Robin Thomas
Dr. Gibbs
Garikayi Mutambirwa
Meeker
Julia Sweeney
Jenny Gibbs
Lindze Letherman
Kelly Gibbs
Jason George
Richard
Linda Kim
Jay
Ken Jenkins
NSA Agent Moore
Esperanza Catubig
Ticket Agent
Jennifer Manley
Security Officer
Scott Thomson
Tourist Dad
Deborah Rawlings
Tourist Mom
Jodie Milks
Bright Freshman
Brad 'Chip' Pope
Confused Freshman
Tony Abatemarco
Administrator
Pagsusuri ng User
Saintedyfy59
19/03/2026 23:34
Clockstoppers
Kim Domingo
04/09/2024 09:05
Clockstoppers_360P
marleine
29/05/2023 11:20
Clockstoppers_720p(480P)
Nikita
29/05/2023 11:04
source: Clockstoppers
Blaq Mushka
23/05/2023 03:59
This is a fun movie for kids, I went with 7 - 8 year old kids, they loved it : with them around, it interesting, otherwise, don't go with adults, they'll find it kinda stupid.
By the way, it's paradoxal to see a movie based on a plot very close to an old Star Trek episode ("Wink of an eye") directed by Jonathan Frakes...!
Hussein Chour
23/05/2023 03:59
Since I just read I cant curse, I will keep this as nice as possible. If somebody were to give this DVD to me as a present, I would just as soon use it as toilet paper as I would a movie. It made horrible attempted jokes like when whats-her-face goes "you wish" to the main dude. It was like a train with no..... um.... train. The previews were misleading by making you think that it was funny. In the commercials, it made it look like the friend had a good part... but when you saw it, you realized that he had 9-10 lines max.
If they took out the pointless, useless, horrible scenes, the movie would not be a movie at all, and just one of those five-minute specials in between mediocre TV shows. To avoid this, the director (who is hopefully out of a job) added stupid pointless scenes like the dance scene. 100% pointless. You might say it was "to show you what the watch could do." but we know what it can do!You don't need to put retarded scenes in to lengthen the movie and make the actors feel that they have a good part. So, in conclusion (much rejoicing that its over) I spent 6.50 on some comfy seats that were good for naps.
Dr SID
23/05/2023 03:59
First of all, almost entire movie is one big plot hole. I don't understand how the filmmakers can think that audience could be stupid enough to not notice how impossible this whole movie is. This movie has a story that gives rules but don't play by the rules, and I can tell you, I HATE THAT!
Acting, directing etc... are in basic collage movie level.
If you are 12 years old, and guys in school tells you every week that you are genius or clever (and you don't know why they call you that), this might be your movie! Otherwise avoid at any cost!
Kefilwe Mabote
23/05/2023 03:59
I'm really glad to see such a good kid movie again. The music went along great with the movie, all fun. The special effects were fantastic, (although it was "The Matrix" that re-defined bullet-time photography), those in charge of special effects did a great job with what they did. French Stewart was great! Glad to see Jonathan Frakes do such a good job and hope he'll come out with more.
Ray Elina Samantaray
23/05/2023 03:59
The previews for this movie were VERY misleading. Some critics deemed it "Back to the Future" for a new generation. To me, this statement is blasphemy. Back to the Future is a classic. The fact that people would compare it to this film is offensive. This movie was not entertaining AT ALL. Am I wrong, or are movies supposed to be entertaining? I respect Jonathan Frakes, but he made a bad decision in directing this terrible movie. Poor acting, stupid plot, and no entertaining elements. Granted, the idea that one could stop time using a watch is somewhat interesting, but the movie did not make it interesting at all. To quote Dave Chappelle as Rick James, "I wish I had more hands, so I could give this movie four thumbs down!"
Fanell Nguema
23/05/2023 03:59
Jonathan Frakes once again demonstrates why he shouldn't be directing any film, let alone one that's supposed to keep you awake for an hour and a half.
Even ignoring the obvious scientific issues surrounding hypertime, this film makes no attempt to be of interest to anyone other the most juvenile of 13 year olds, and even they were pretty restless judging by the audience in the theatre I saw this in. By the time fifteen minutes had passed, I wished I had a hypertime device to make the film pass more quickly.
If you're after an entertaining family film, watch the little seen "Meteor Man" and give this one a pass.
Pagsusuri ng User
Saintedyfy59
19/03/2026 23:34
Clockstoppers
Kim Domingo
04/09/2024 09:05
Clockstoppers_360P
marleine
29/05/2023 11:20
Clockstoppers_720p(480P)
Nikita
29/05/2023 11:04
source: Clockstoppers
Blaq Mushka
23/05/2023 03:59
This is a fun movie for kids, I went with 7 - 8 year old kids, they loved it : with them around, it interesting, otherwise, don't go with adults, they'll find it kinda stupid.
By the way, it's paradoxal to see a movie based on a plot very close to an old Star Trek episode ("Wink of an eye") directed by Jonathan Frakes...!
Hussein Chour
23/05/2023 03:59
Since I just read I cant curse, I will keep this as nice as possible. If somebody were to give this DVD to me as a present, I would just as soon use it as toilet paper as I would a movie. It made horrible attempted jokes like when whats-her-face goes "you wish" to the main dude. It was like a train with no..... um.... train. The previews were misleading by making you think that it was funny. In the commercials, it made it look like the friend had a good part... but when you saw it, you realized that he had 9-10 lines max.
If they took out the pointless, useless, horrible scenes, the movie would not be a movie at all, and just one of those five-minute specials in between mediocre TV shows. To avoid this, the director (who is hopefully out of a job) added stupid pointless scenes like the dance scene. 100% pointless. You might say it was "to show you what the watch could do." but we know what it can do!You don't need to put retarded scenes in to lengthen the movie and make the actors feel that they have a good part. So, in conclusion (much rejoicing that its over) I spent 6.50 on some comfy seats that were good for naps.
Dr SID
23/05/2023 03:59
First of all, almost entire movie is one big plot hole. I don't understand how the filmmakers can think that audience could be stupid enough to not notice how impossible this whole movie is. This movie has a story that gives rules but don't play by the rules, and I can tell you, I HATE THAT!
Acting, directing etc... are in basic collage movie level.
If you are 12 years old, and guys in school tells you every week that you are genius or clever (and you don't know why they call you that), this might be your movie! Otherwise avoid at any cost!
Kefilwe Mabote
23/05/2023 03:59
I'm really glad to see such a good kid movie again. The music went along great with the movie, all fun. The special effects were fantastic, (although it was "The Matrix" that re-defined bullet-time photography), those in charge of special effects did a great job with what they did. French Stewart was great! Glad to see Jonathan Frakes do such a good job and hope he'll come out with more.
Ray Elina Samantaray
23/05/2023 03:59
The previews for this movie were VERY misleading. Some critics deemed it "Back to the Future" for a new generation. To me, this statement is blasphemy. Back to the Future is a classic. The fact that people would compare it to this film is offensive. This movie was not entertaining AT ALL. Am I wrong, or are movies supposed to be entertaining? I respect Jonathan Frakes, but he made a bad decision in directing this terrible movie. Poor acting, stupid plot, and no entertaining elements. Granted, the idea that one could stop time using a watch is somewhat interesting, but the movie did not make it interesting at all. To quote Dave Chappelle as Rick James, "I wish I had more hands, so I could give this movie four thumbs down!"
Fanell Nguema
23/05/2023 03:59
Jonathan Frakes once again demonstrates why he shouldn't be directing any film, let alone one that's supposed to keep you awake for an hour and a half.
Even ignoring the obvious scientific issues surrounding hypertime, this film makes no attempt to be of interest to anyone other the most juvenile of 13 year olds, and even they were pretty restless judging by the audience in the theatre I saw this in. By the time fifteen minutes had passed, I wished I had a hypertime device to make the film pass more quickly.
If you're after an entertaining family film, watch the little seen "Meteor Man" and give this one a pass.
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on MovieBox are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.