This Abbott and Costello film has fallen into the public domain and I can see why. It's not just because it was made by a tiny studio, but I just can't see why anyone would worry about renewing the copyright on this thing! It's a cheesy and silly mess...although I was surprised that in spite of many shortcomings, it still managed to be entertaining...especially if you just turn off your brain and enjoy it for what it is and nothing more.
As far as what is to like, the most interesting thing about this film is the casting. I love odd and obscure film facts and this one sure offers some unusual casting. First, it's the only pairing of Joe Besser (who, I hate) and Shemp Howard--both of which were the 3rd Stooge. Following Curly Howard's stroke, his oldest brother, Shemp rejoined the Stooges (he'd been with them on stage in their pre-Hollywood days). After Shemp's death, the Stooges had Besser take his role--not realizing that he unfortunately is about as funny as cancer. How Besser and his very loud and effeminate shtick ever became a Stooge or regular on "The Abbott and Costello Show" has always amazed me. Second, Max and Buddy Baer both were cast as thugs working for the evil woman, Hillary Brooke. Max had been heavyweight boxing champion of the world and his son played Jethro on "Green Acres". Buddy, the larger of the two, was a pro wrestler. Third, the film features Frank Buck and Clyde Beatty as themselves. Both men were marketing geniuses. Buck was an adventurer and hunter who traveled the jungles making documentaries and fighting lions and the like before opening up his own zoo. Beatty was a big game hunter, lion tamer and circus owner. This certainly is an unusual group of fellas! Another thing I liked is the evolution of Bud Abbott. In almost all the films, he was a bit of a selfish jerk who used Lou whenever he could. However, here he is way off the deep end with greed--so much so that, for once, he got a lot of the laughs himself. His greedy disregard for others was very much like Daffy Duck's in ALI BABA BUNNY. In fact, he is the best thing about this otherwise dreary film.
The final plus is that the film ended well. The ending was very unusual and offered a nice change of pace for the team.
What was not to like? Well, where can I start? However, instead of focusing on everything I'll just mention a few of the major problems. The biggest one is the use of a guy in a gorilla costume--a very common (and stupid) convention of the 1940s and 50s. None of these looked the least bit convincing and this cliché really sucks, as it NEVER was funny...not even once. Even most 5 year-olds would immediately recognize the ruse, so you can't be afraid or laugh when it appears--just annoyed. I noticed that one reviewer gave this film a 9 or 10--how can you do that when some guy in a moth-eaten gorilla costume plays a prominent place in this film?! The other main problem was that at times the film was well done but others it was annoyingly unfunny because the writing was, at best, inconsistent and the production looked like it was made for $582.34. One example of bad were having Besser say or do anything--plus his part was ill-defined and unnecessary. This is somewhat the same with Brooke, as she could have been interesting but her part was both ill-defined and she just disappeared from the film. Another was how the plot seemed to morph into a remake of ROAD TO ZANZIBAR--copying so much of this film yet giving it no credit whatsoever.
Overall, a very mixed bag that is mostly of value to film historians and film nuts like me, though others might be entertained by the film despite its high amount of cheese. Still, you can do better with almost any other Abbott and Costello film, so I recommend you see them first.