moviebox header nav
moviebox search icon
muted

The Sound and the Fury

1959

R

1 h 50 m

الولايات المتحدة

دراما

Drama focusing on a family of Southern aristocrats who are trying to deal with the dissolution of their clan and the loss of its reputation, faith, fortunes, and respect.
More

6.2 /10

1096 people rated

شاهد أونلاين

شاهد في التطبيق

الحلقات

أفضل الممثلين

تقييمات المستخدمين

الحلقات
أفضل الممثلين
تقييمات المستخدمين

الحلقات

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex
أفضل الممثلين(19)
starring avatar
Yul Brynner
Jason Compson
starring avatar
Joanne Woodward
Quentin Compson
starring avatar
Joanne Woodward
Narrator
starring avatar
Margaret Leighton
Caddy Compson
starring avatar
Stuart Whitman
Charlie Busch
starring avatar
Ethel Waters
Dilsey
starring avatar
Jack Warden
Ben Compson
starring avatar
Françoise Rosay
Mrs. Caroline Compson
starring avatar
John Beal
Howard Compson
starring avatar
Albert Dekker
Earl Snopes
starring avatar
Steven Perry
Luster
starring avatar
Bill Gunn
T.P. - Dilsey's Grandson
starring avatar
Roy Glenn
Job
default avatar
Don Ames
Townsman
starring avatar
Jean Carson
Mary Ellen
starring avatar
William Challee
Roustabout
starring avatar
Esther Dale
Mrs. Maud Mansfield
default avatar
Walt Davis
Townsman
default avatar
Gary Diamond
Boy

تقييمات المستخدمين

author avatar

aïchou Malika

29/05/2023 22:24
source: The Sound and the Fury
author avatar

Chocolate babies

18/11/2022 08:35
Trailer—The Sound and the Fury
author avatar

journey

16/11/2022 13:32
The Sound and the Fury
author avatar

Lakimora Tshimanga

16/11/2022 02:28
OK...this is one of the WORST adaptations of all time. For those who say "it's BETTER than the original novel"...are you MAD!!! Faulkner's "The Sound and the Fury" is one the the greatest American novels ever written (just because it can't be read by someone with a 5th grade education doesn't mean it isn't any good). The only thing this film has in common with the novel is the title and the names of the characters. Overall...it it dreadful, and fans of the novel are encouraged to stay away from it. Oh...and who's brilliant idea was it to cast Yul Brenner as Jason. UGH!
author avatar

선미 SUNMI

16/11/2022 02:28
As a fan of William Faulkner in general, and of the NOVEL The Sound and the Fury in particular, I couldn't quite stomach this film for more than a few minutes at a time. Jason Compson is one of the best characters in literature, and to watch Yul Bryner butcher him on film was not amusing.
author avatar

adinathembi

16/11/2022 02:28
Yul Brynner is at his best! His commanding presence is spellbinding. His acting, superb as the appointed Guardian of Joanne Woodward who gives a great performance as his rebellious and attractive ward. The cast is believable, full of unusual characters that are typical of Tenessee Williams' survivors of the grandeur of the Old South, now long gone. The tension that builds between the Guardian (Yul Brynner) and his ward (Joanne Woodward) is entertaining and exciting to watch. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie and recommend it highly to anyone who would enjoy taking a look into the present day remnants of the Old South. Four stars!!!
author avatar

Deity

16/11/2022 02:28
Why is it that all stories regarding the South have to have at least one character who is mentally challenged? Oh well, at least Jack Warden was convincing. Predictably dreary directing by Martin Ritt (Hud; Hombre). Brynner was definitely out of place as the lead, but Georgia native Woodward was right on target. British actress Margaret Leigton was terrific. She's another reminder that even in the 50's, some of Hollywood's best were skinny, chain-smoking women from across the pond. Some things never change, I guess. The print I saw on INHD was in excellent shape. I wonder why this hasn't been released on DVD.
author avatar

Koka

16/11/2022 02:28
I'm watching "S&F" on Turner tonight (8/16/11), & I don't recognize anything from the classic novel. I had seen the ending a long time ago, with Yul (Jason) & Quentin(!!!??) (Joanne) sauntering down a southern road, musing optimistically--& I thought the same then. I vaguely recall reading something that Martin Ritt wanted to help out Faulkner ($$) by adapting his early masterpiece, & I guess this was the result: absolute garbage. Even with zilch familiarity with the novel, the film "adaptation" is just a baffling mishmash; with __any__ familiarity with the novel, the film is an abomination. Thanks to Turner & anybody else who would snooze their audience to sleep, I guess we can say with a sigh of such adaptations, like Dilsey, "they endured."
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on MovieBox are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.