moviebox header nav
moviebox search icon
muted

Shock

2016

R

1 h 9 m

الولايات المتحدة

رعب

When a gruesome killer targets the staff of a Psychiatric facility, its up to ex-cop turned Private investigator David Evans to find the killer and put his own life back into perspective.
More

3.2 /10

126 people rated

شاهد أونلاين

شاهد في التطبيق

الحلقات

أفضل الممثلين

تقييمات المستخدمين

الحلقات
أفضل الممثلين
تقييمات المستخدمين

الحلقات

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex
أفضل الممثلين(18)
default avatar
Mohammed Bardi
David Evans
starring avatar
Meredith Basinger
Valerie
default avatar
Keasha Bell
Nurse Ebony
starring avatar
Leonel Claude
Security Guard Hammond
starring avatar
Amiee Conn
Maria Mitchell
starring avatar
Nicole Cunniff
Nurse Patty
starring avatar
Shirley Dalmas
Anchorwoman
default avatar
Susan A. Denbow
Nurse Cyndi
starring avatar
Paula Drake
Nurse Vanessa
starring avatar
Freddie Edo
Detective Richards
starring avatar
Brittany Falardeau
Lilly
starring avatar
Stefanie Feldman
Nurse Becky
starring avatar
Micah Fitzgerald
Beast
starring avatar
James Killebrew
Dr. Wells
starring avatar
Markiss McFadden
Robert
starring avatar
Aeriél Miranda
Bianka Davis
starring avatar
Kausar Mohammed
Sara
starring avatar
Chris Moss
Tariq

تقييمات المستخدمين

author avatar

Ansyla Honny.

29/05/2023 08:37
source: Shock
author avatar

@Mrs A #30092017

22/05/2023 23:25
Moviecut—Shock
author avatar

Ansyla Honny.

22/11/2022 15:59
David "English is my second language" Evans (Mohammed Bardi) is an ex-cop and out of work detective who struggles with vices. When a couple of nurses from the Kingdom Psychotic Hospital are murdered, he is hired to investigate by his ex-girlfriend Maria (Amiée Conn). We see the killings. It is a deformed blue skinned man who looks like "he who which we do not speak." There are no suspects, just a new electronic device to treat patients. The victims have Arabic writing on them, famous quotes about revenge. This was low budget all around. The script was terribly boring. The acting wasn't there. Mohammed Bardi has no business around a camera. The sound was uneven. Worth a punch on the hacker's card. Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
author avatar

Djenny Djenny

22/11/2022 15:59
From the godawful "acting (that's stretching it ...)" to the incredibly craptastic special effects this is one of those criminally bad movies. Reminds me of the clueless characters in Waiting for Guffman except they aren't funny, just awful actors. The story is too dull to bother describing. Movie making at its worst.
author avatar

somali boy

22/11/2022 15:59
So this film is definitely not a big budget masterpiece and it cannot compare or be listed at the same league as the super buget films out there but it certainly has some redeeming qualities. The plot is nothing special but still engaging, the acting was pretty good from Arthur Roberts who plays the Psychiatrist. The lead actors were both decent for first time comers and with experience and training they might grow into something big. Cinematography was excellent, however, the biggest probelm with the film is the editing which seems rushed, both the scene editing and sound editing fail miserably here. Some of the suspenseful scenes seemed rushed and so fails to build up tension. The sound editing was also awful, espcially during some of the action more tense parts you feel there is lack of loud sound effects that makes the scene powerful. Generally a decent effort, that could have been better perhaps if it were put in more professional hands and proper editing. Worth a watch at least to support independent films to make better films for sure.
author avatar

Nelsa

22/11/2022 15:59
Well that was a waste of 69 minutes! The lead protagonist couldn't act if his life depended on it. He was so wooden I'm surprised he didn't give himself splinters every time he opened his mouth to give a tedious and lengthy line. The film was really bad. I was wondering why scenes were so long and filled with absolutely meaningless dialogue then realised it's because talking is a lot cheaper than doing anything. Basically this movie was written on the back of a stamp with no budget so it had to be filled with mundane, irrelevant and poorly executed dialogue to pad it out by about 90%. Examples of this were excessively protracted scenes where the lead actor was asking a series of questions in his role as a private detective. Not only were they delivered flat as if he was reading cold off a script he'd never seen before but the questions went on and on obviously to fill time on an already short running movie.Such was the length of such drivel that one actor in particular had issues with her lines. Her dialogue was peppered with points where she stumbled over them which was most bizarre. They also couldn't afford proper microphones so sound levels were all over the place and even in the same scenes, actors had completely diverse levels so either booming or quiet. The whole film was just a waste of time and effort. I'm sure the production team slapped each other on the back to congratulate themselves on reaching past the hour mark for material to piece together to make this film but boy was it dull and 3rd rate. The problem is that I've seen low budget movies and if you have the right story and cast you can work magic. Unfortunately they didn't have any of that here. It was a movie borne out of someone's ego that they thought they were special and could create some type of masterpiece. I hate to tell you but you suck as a director, the story sucks, the script and actors certainly suck and everything about this stinker does also.
author avatar

Sommité Røyal

22/11/2022 04:35
Shock
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on MovieBox are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.