فتاة مارس

Some things you're likely to hear people say after seeing Miss March advertised on television. "Oh, that's Trevor Moore and Zach Creggar! They're from WKUK! I can't wait to see it!" or "Oh, I love WKUK, let's go check that out!" Do you know how I know this? I was one of those people. This is a film that according to many many critics, "If you're a fan of the show, you'll quite probably enjoy this movie." Guess what. The critics were wrong. I find Whitest Kids U' Know hilarious, sketch after sketch, it leaves me amazed. They were in my area and I would have killed to see them perform some sketches live. Trevor, Zach, and the other Whitest Kids are some of my favorite comic performers alive today. Anyway, now onto the film. Miss March is about a kid who plans to lose his virginity to his girlfriend on prom night. The kid is Eugene Bell, played by Zach Creggar. His best friend, Tucker Cleigh, played by Trevor Moore, tells him he should get drunk first, because it will help him last longer. He gets drunk, going through the wrong door and falling down the basement stairs, knocking down a toolbox and it falls on his head, knocking him out. The next scene opens with him waking from a four year coma, only to find out that his girlfriend is now a Playboy bunny. With the annual Playboy Anniversary Bash right around the corner, the two friends must get to the Playboy mansion so Eugene can get his girlfriend back. The acting from the main characters, and surprisingly enough, Hugh Hefner himself, was decent. I kind of liked the acting. One of the few things I enjoyed, honestly. The script was awful though. This is the worst writing that I've seen from Trevor and Zach, and I was left disappointed. The jokes were very repetitive and some of the most immature things I've seen from them(although Whitest Kids is a very immature show. Anyone who watches can vouch for this.), and most of the acting was mediocre at best. Basically, I felt this film was terrible, and even if you do watch Whitest Kids U' Know, enter this film with caution, because this is definitely not a proper representation of the talents of Trevor and Zach, and cameos from the others would have been nice, too, actually. I would have loved to see Timmy, Sam, and the others appear at some point or another.

Obviously, this movie is not for everyone. It makes last years Sex Drive look like a family movie. Because of this, many people will be turned off by the movie. About a third of the people walked out of the theater when I saw it, and most likely the majority of them went home and rated this a One. Being a fan of the Whitest Kids U'know, I was very excited to hear about this back in December. and then very annoyed when they kept pushing back the release date. But finally, It arrived and it was great, in my opinion. Not quite to my expectations but by no means bad. It is true that some of the jokes become incredibly repetitive, and they dragged the lesbians scene out to the point that it was no longer funny. But more often than not, the jokes are hits rather than misses. Many people have given the film poor reviews because of how unbelievably vulgar the jokes are. Which makes me wonder: Why would you see a raunchy teen sex comedy that takes place at the playboy mansion, and was written, directed by, and starring two of the Whitest Kids U'know if you are offended by vulgar humor? Trevor Moore was hilarious as always but I do feel that Zach Creggor's talent was in many ways wasted. He got very few of the best lines, though, one could expect that since he plays the cliché "serious" buddy that is found in all teen sex comedies. Craig Robinson was great, though I thought that his character got a bit annoying after a while. But despite the films dirty charm and frequent laugh out loud moments, there were also a fair number of flaws. Miss MArch suffered from the same issue that the latest Harold And Kumar installment did: Every once in a while they would go just a bit too far. In a film like this you have to walk the line. In many cases, they would take a flying leap over it. Which is fine, to a certain extent. The problem was that the just didn't seem to realize when to quit. Dirty does not always mean funny. If you are trying to decide whether or not to see it, just know that it can either be a laugh out loud hilarious raunch filled comedy roller-coaster or it can be a dull, lifeless, trashy, tasteless, bomb of a movie, depending on your taste, or lack thereof. I personally found it to be the former rather than the latter. But it is most certainly not the type of movie that you should see with your family. 8/10

Miss March_720p(480P)

source: Miss March

Dumbing down will continue until this kind of trash is ignored. It's a pity that this filth ever made it to the screen. The writing is sub par, the producers accept anything sleazy that will sell tickets and there is a whole generation of people who think this entertainment. i admit i walked out of the movie - a waste of time for sure. What's going to happen to this country if idiots who think this is funny even consider voting in an election.The audience for this type of pseudo entertainment are like grubby little kids hiding in the closet, sneaking a peak at *. They think it's hilarious. Somehow we've lost "It". The great comedians, Richard Pryor, Billy Crystal, Martin Short got along fine with a stand-up routine holding a microphone.

I went into this movie expecting something horrid. But I came out of the film pleasantly surprised. The 2 actors are really good its just the stuff written for them just isn't that good. I mean it has a few good laughs in their from the french kiss my d*** to the stabbing a face with a fork its just their isn't a consistent amount of good laughs in their. Its a good rental and I hope Zach and Trevor get to make a whitest kids movie because I know it would be hilarious. If you want to hear how cool and funny they are get the spill pod cast off i-tunes and get the interview they are pretty cool guys. Also I have to admit the playmates aren't too bad on the eyes either.

I learned 3 things about myself when I saw Miss March, a comedy in which a young man awakens from a four-year coma to discover his former girlfriend posed for Playboy as Miss March during his absence: 1. I am a prude by any standard applied to this abomination of a home movie disguised as a film comedy. The references to penises are multiple and always degrading; accompanying the infantile penile obsession is a satire of epilepsy rude beyond reason. The times a character defecates in front of the camera are shocking and gratuitous in the extreme. 2. As a former English major, I learned the art the picaresque has been used to show knowledge emerging from travel. However, this adolescent trip is so beyond enlightening that the Odysseys of characters from Homer to Kumar are forever diminished by the association. 3. I resent Hugh Hefner, in his 80's looking like his 90's, playing himself when no one, not even he, could ever portray the depraved, aging satyr better than he does in real life. His Viagra bill is either astronomical or just for show. There, I feel much better about wasting two hours on this claptrap; after all, watching bad movies is only part of what I do.

There are some humorous moments in this movie, but, not enough to overcome how truly horrible it really is. In between the humorous moments is a stupid movie with very bad acting and scenes that look like they were added just to make the movie longer. I'm pretty sure this movie was written in someone's dorm room while they were failing out of everything. How it became a movie is astonishing, but, I suppose Zach Creggor and Trevor Moore deserve credit for selling it to someone. I wish I had the dollar back it cost me to rent it and the gas it took me to get to the redbox. If you must watch it, I suggest you surf the internet or play a game at the same time to help pass the time.

Some things you're likely to hear people say after seeing Miss March advertised on television. "Oh, that's Trevor Moore and Zach Creggar! They're from WKUK! I can't wait to see it!" or "Oh, I love WKUK, let's go check that out!" Do you know how I know this? I was one of those people. This is a film that according to many many critics, "If you're a fan of the show, you'll quite probably enjoy this movie." Guess what. The critics were wrong. I find Whitest Kids U' Know hilarious, sketch after sketch, it leaves me amazed. They were in my area and I would have killed to see them perform some sketches live. Trevor, Zach, and the other Whitest Kids are some of my favorite comic performers alive today. Anyway, now onto the film. Miss March is about a kid who plans to lose his virginity to his girlfriend on prom night. The kid is Eugene Bell, played by Zach Creggar. His best friend, Tucker Cleigh, played by Trevor Moore, tells him he should get drunk first, because it will help him last longer. He gets drunk, going through the wrong door and falling down the basement stairs, knocking down a toolbox and it falls on his head, knocking him out. The next scene opens with him waking from a four year coma, only to find out that his girlfriend is now a Playboy bunny. With the annual Playboy Anniversary Bash right around the corner, the two friends must get to the Playboy mansion so Eugene can get his girlfriend back. The acting from the main characters, and surprisingly enough, Hugh Hefner himself, was decent. I kind of liked the acting. One of the few things I enjoyed, honestly. The script was awful though. This is the worst writing that I've seen from Trevor and Zach, and I was left disappointed. The jokes were very repetitive and some of the most immature things I've seen from them(although Whitest Kids is a very immature show. Anyone who watches can vouch for this.), and most of the acting was mediocre at best. Basically, I felt this film was terrible, and even if you do watch Whitest Kids U' Know, enter this film with caution, because this is definitely not a proper representation of the talents of Trevor and Zach, and cameos from the others would have been nice, too, actually. I would have loved to see Timmy, Sam, and the others appear at some point or another.

I am fed up with this movie getting bad reviews. As far as performances go: Zach Cregger was phenomenal. His acting ability exceeds that of the average big name actor in this industry. And if you can prove yourself to be a good actor in a road trip sex comedy, then that's a pretty big accomplishment if you ask me. When he needs to be funny he's hilarious. When he needs to be serious, he's completely nonchalant. Every detail of his tone and expressions are immediately recognized by the audience, and he does a good job of not being cocky about it. Not to mention this is only his second film. Trevor Moore did a fantastic comedic job. Most critics call him a "Jim Carrey wannabe," which is a joke. For one thing, Jim Carrey never wrote and directed anything I've ever seen. Also, Carrey has the annoying tendency to over act. For some reason he has this idea that the more over the top and exaggerated you act, the funnier your character will be. I disagree. That's just underestimating the intelligence of your audience. It is clear that Trevor Moore has a natural awareness of when to tone it down, and when to raise things up. And of course, he has this signature bug-eyed expression and fluctuation of the voice that will make any line ten times funnier. When you put the two men together, you get Eugene and Tucker; characters with a surprisingly heart-warming chemistry. Unlike most movies, you see throughout this story that these two friends really, truly care about each other. Sure, they have opposite points of view, and it can be a real chore to have to deal with one another, but they remain best friends through it all. The writers did an excellent job displaying their devotion. Which answers the question that I often ask when I watch movies like "Dumb and Dumber" and "Wedding Crashers," which is, "If they can't stand each other, why are they even friends?" The movie is oozing originality, which most critics have decided to overlook when they heard the words "two boys" and "road trip." The typical sex comedy usually makes the protagonist the straight man, and his nutty friend tends to have all the bad luck. However this movie has the role of the protagonist shared between both the straight man and the nutty friend. Both characters learn a lesson, both characters develop throughout the movie, and both characters get "the girl." They also did a good job of consistently being a comedy, and not getting lost in the romance, which movies (mainly featuring the "Frat Pack") tend to do. Not to mention, how many times do you see a conservative, pro-abstinent lead in a movie like this? Isn't it usually just two horny boys trying to get laid? The character Eugene, or the "straight man," also rebelled against the stereotypes by not being afraid to look stupid. In most movies, characters like him are lovable, nearly flawless, and hated by almost no one. Here, Eugene was scaring children, pooping on floors, flashing a gas station, and pissing off a famous rapper. FINALLY a protagonist that knows how to get EMBARRASSED. The movie also makes the audience take another look at Playboy. Instead of viewing it as a trashy magazine that exploits women, it is portrayed as a celebration of how beautiful women can be. I gave the movie an 8, simply because it wasn't their idea to make the movie about a road trip to the Playboy mansion, and I know they are capable of producing something golden. I've recommended this movie to everyone I know. It has enough "aww" moments to take your girlfriend or boyfriend to, and enough buddy-buddy moments to take your best friend to as well. I hope after reading this, movie-goers will give the film a chance, and ignore all the thoughtless, inaccurate reviews that completely bash it.