moviebox header nav
moviebox search icon
muted

Lone Wolf

2021

R

1 h 43 m

أستراليا

دراما

خيال علمي

إثارة

In the near-future, where constant surveillance is the norm, a group of activists plan an act of urban terrorism, unaware that they may be lured into a trap.
More

3.4 /10

252 people rated

شاهد أونلاين

شاهد في التطبيق

الحلقات

أفضل الممثلين

تقييمات المستخدمين

الحلقات
أفضل الممثلين
تقييمات المستخدمين

الحلقات

film
lklk
Netflix
Plex
أفضل الممثلين(18)
starring avatar
Hugo Weaving
Minister
starring avatar
Diana Glenn
Kylie
starring avatar
Tilda Cobham-Hervey
Winnie
starring avatar
Josh McConville
Conrad
starring avatar
Stephen Curry
Assistant Commissioner
starring avatar
Marlon Williams
Alex Ossipon
starring avatar
Chris Bunton
Stevie
default avatar
Lawrence Mooney
Father Michaelis
starring avatar
Tyler Coppin
Hippy Karl
default avatar
Jim Coulson
Toodles
starring avatar
Karlis Zaid
Vladimir
default avatar
Alexander Gavioli
Young Customer
starring avatar
Roy Barker
Mortician
starring avatar
Steven Kwon
Groom
default avatar
Betsie Zhang
Bride
default avatar
Adam White
Bridal Video Operator
starring avatar
Eddie Baroo
Rolli from Magic Carpets
default avatar
Hamish Ogilvie
Gene from Magic Carpets

تقييمات المستخدمين

author avatar

user4121114070630

29/05/2023 22:31
Lone Wolf_720p(480P)
author avatar

DnQ_💙

15/02/2023 11:17
This movie is trash. The writing's bad, the concept isn't, at all, interesting, and it seems to pose as a sci-fi movie -- which, it isn't. This is my assessment, after making it through twenty-nine minutes of this film. To be fair, it is possible that there's some sci-fi element to this movie, and I just didn't bother to stick around long enough to find out what it is. Like I've said, I only lasted twenty-nine minutes. As far as I can tell, the only thing that may be considered sci-fi, is the notion of automated surveillance. If that's the sci-fi concept, then it's pretty thin. I stopped watching this movie because it's painfully boring, and doesn't seem to have much of a direction. After a while, I found myself wondering, "What, exactly, am I looking at?" After turning it off, I read the synopsis, and concluded that the synopsis does a better job explaining the movie, than me actually watching the movie. This is a clear sign of terrible writing. If your audience watches twenty-nine minutes of your film, and is confused about what they're watching, your writing isn't clever, or innovative, it's just bad. After reading the synopsis, I came to realize that I hadn't missed anything. My confusion wasn't due to me not paying attention. After all, the synopsis seems to fill in the gaps and explain what I was watching. However, if I have to read the synopsis, in order to make the movie more coherent, then the writer has clearly dropped the ball. I don't recommend this movie to anyone. Unless you're the writer, or unless you helped create this movie, in some way, or are a friend of someone in either of these capacities, then you're not likely to find any value in this film. I give this movie two stars because, although the writing and execution are terrible, the filmmaker does have competent technical skills. The camera isn't shaky, the audio is fine, the acting is adequate -- things like that. However, that's a low bar, when we're talking about the quality of a movie.
author avatar

Paulette Butterfy🦋

15/02/2023 11:17
Matrix 4 was a flop, needless to say--pc reboots typically are; Hugo Weaving gave an awesome performance in this peace and if he turned down M4 to do this I commend him for being so discerning. This film is 1000x better than m4.
Disclaimer: All videos and pictures on MovieBox are from the Internet, and their copyrights belong to the original creators. We only provide webpage services and do not store, record, or upload any content.