فتيان أشقياء 2

I need the one Messi is inside the movie

yes

Bad Boys II_360P

bad boys II

young life

Whenever producer Jerry Bruckheimer and director Michael Bay team up to make a movie, you can count on a few things-it's going to be big, loud, explosive and annoying as all hell. Their track record certainly supports that, after all, this is the team that brought us such films as `Armageddon,' and `Pearl Harbor.' It was especially funny to see Bay directing the latter two films considering they were marketed strongly towards teenage girls. When you consider that this man has only done hard-core action flicks prior to the two films listed above, it drove me to one conclusion; Bay is in fact a fourteen year old girl trapped in a grown man's body. Okay, all jokes aside, Bay has now brought us the unwanted and completely unnecessary sequel to the 1995 film, `Bad Boys II.' So where can this sequel go that no other action flick has done before-absolutely nowhere. It's obvious and obnoxious from start to finish. And the worst part about it all is that it is far too long for it's own good. We team up with Miami cops Marcus Burnett (Martin Lawrence) and Mike Lowrey (Will Smith) eight years after their first big drug bust. This time, the two are after a Cuban named "Johnny" Tapia (Jordi Mollà) and his drug cartel that are responsible for supplying Miami with ecstasy. Beyond the aspects of their job, the two cops confront the notion that Lowrey has been seeing Burnett's sister Sydney (Gabrielle Union), who is also an undercover cop on the same case to crack the dealers. It becomes not only a mission to stop the drug dealers, but also a personal vendetta against Tapia when he kidnaps Sydney. If you have ever seen every other buddy cop movie in the history of buddy cop movies, then you have already seen `Bad Boys II.' But the film mostly resembles that of `Tango & Cash,' the 1989 flick that starred Sylvester Stallone and Kurt Russell. I won't deny that Smith and Lawrence is a good screen pair-they are fun to watch and provide a few good laughs. But for the majority of the film, they are just screaming the f-word back and forth while their guns are blazing. The effect looses its comic appeal after the first ten minutes, if it had any comic appeal to begin with. Beyond the rehashed story, the film is completely outlandish. You can tell this when you see the poster and the first thing that comes to mind is `Black Hawk Down,' another Bruckheimer flick, but one that was actually quite good. But `Bad Boys II' treats Miami as if it were Mogadishu. Machine guns are constantly being fired, cars driving out of control, helicopters and speed boats trying to stop the flow of ecstasy into the city and a few KKK members just around the ride. It's as if the Miami police and the drug dealers have declared war on each other. The whole thing feels so stupid to watch, regardless of how well done the action scenes are. It begs the question, in a movie, just because we can blow something up, does that mean that we necessarily should blow something up? A question that Bay and Bruckheimer really need to start asking themselves. Enough said, `Bad Boys II' is a waste of your time and a waste of celluloid. **

This movie was very entertaining. It had me wanting to watch all the way until the end. It was about 30 minutes too long I'm afraid though. There were many times that I thought there were scenes that could have been cut and still made this movie funny and with great action. Some of the parts were a little overacted as well. All in all I thought this was a good film and I will watch it over and over again for a few scenes. It does have some horrible language in this movie so do not let you kids see it unless you don't care if they repeat what they see. Check the movie out if you are of age. It's a good film.

A huge budget sequel to the dumb "Bad Boys." I guess it was inevitable. I saw the HBO special on this movie and watch how Will Smith, Michael Bay, and Jerry Bruckheimer went on and on about how great this movie is. What was really happening was that Michael Bay and Will Smith were happy that they received a fat paycheck and Bruckheimer was happy that he will make another huge pile of money with the release. They said "we finally got it perfect." Perfect? Perfectly over-blown trash maybe. There is not the slightest distant glimmer of anything that faintly resembles originality here. It is all one boring dull mindless cliché after another until the viewer is literally ready to puke. The "story" starts with Will Smith, who is hot for Gabrielle Union who is Martin Lawrence's sister which is a a cheesy love vs family problem that is addressed so poorly that it shouldn't be there. And guess what? There is a twist! Gabrielle Union is an undercover cop working on what maybe the same case! Oh dear! We are also treated to a big loud car chase in which well over thirty vehicles are totaled along with the bad guys. But the good guys? They don't even get hurt. Some cops manage to land in critical care, but after flipping over in a car going 80 mph straight into a massive fireball in the middle of the highway you'd be dead. Yes the T-1000 survived such a feat, but he is a futuristic robot. Moving right on from the pathetic story and horrible action is the humor. It is also dumb, cliché, and overly vulgar. I mean are rat sex and junior high school level gay jokes something you'd expect to see in a movie not by John Waters? Types of humor have their placement in film, or as Michael Bay demonstrates so well, misplacement. Moving on we come to a sick excuse for a plot device. Towards the end our heroes got save Gabrielle Union who was kidnapped. They pack their service pistols and prepare to go to take on an entire drug cartel. But guess what? The police chief's friends are in the CIA and they decide, out of the goodness of their heart, to help two hotshot loose cannon detectives! So now, with the help of a bunch of CIA commandos half of Cuba is blown up and everyone goes home safe. Preposterous on all counts. There are entertaining movies that follow this kind of preposterous formula. James Bond, for one. He is just as ridiculous as this movie, but he has a light side. He doesn't take himself too seriously. Those films have a tongue in cheek nature that constantly reminds us that we are watching what is basically a fairy tale. Not here. This film takes it self so seriously and tries to be ultra cool and slick. Thankfully it fails on all fronts of film making. Let's hope we don't see anything like it anytime soon. Sick, disgusting, unoriginal, a horrible waste of money, superficial, unentertaining, unfunny, vulgar, and just plain terrible. This sort of Hollywood junk put the word 'bad' in the dictionary. Either that or the Bubonic Plague. Well, I guess they are both bad. 1/10 Rated R: excessive violence, relentless profanity, and all around bad taste

This movie was a hell of a lot of fun to watch. The action sequences were really well done, and there was tons of them. It was a lot more violent than the first one as I noticed. I thought the scene with all the cadavers was really unnecessary. It was kind of gross. And the chemistry between Will Smith and Martin Lawrence is great. The arguments really reflect from the first one. I was really enjoying the tense scenes where the cars were flying off the truck. A great movie. 8 out of 10.

I've never understood this bizarre hatred of Michael Bay that so many so called film ethusiests have. I mean, what is it about HIM that struck a coard with so many? People don't bash Simon West,Martin Campbell, Tony Scott, or Dominic Sena the way the bring the hammer down on Bay. It's not like he was the first guy who was really good at style over substance. I for one am gonna defend the guy here. And no, i'm not some idiot teenager who thinks Charlie's Angels is the best movie ever made. I am an avid film watcher. I probably see close to 100 movies a year IN theaters. Big movies and small alike. I appreciate any genre of film if it's done well. But obviously my first love is, and always will be, action. And I think Michael Bay is one of the best action directors around. As good as James Cameron, John Woo, Ridley Scott, John McTerninan, John Frankenhiemer, and any other guy named John. Is Bad Boys II too exrtavigant? Too explosive? Too indulgent? It's not your money, why should you care? BB2 is action filmaking in it's purest, most volitile form. I can't remember seeing an action movie with this much, well, ACTION in it. This thing drills you like a jackhammer in a way that The Rock could only dream of. It comes close to the "Enough Already" level of action as in Armageddon, but holds off with all the humor brought by the stars. Was there one too many car chases? Yeah, probably, but I'm not complaining. Two and a half hours looks just fine too me. Personally, I like my action movies to exhaust me. And what action it was. The car transport chase is easily better than anything in the Matrix Reloaded and even T3. Not only that, but it's great to see full blown R rated action in all its bloody glory again. Ahh, just like the good old days, when men were men, and action movies were all rated R. Look, if you're all about hating Bay, and blaming him for all of scociety's ills, as well as acusing him of being the antichrist - then what in god's name are you doing watching this movie? It's been pretty well established since The Rock, and especially Armageddon, that you don't like the guy - so why do you keep going to see these movies if you know you're going to hate them? Do the rest of us a favor, get off your high horse and drop the condescending art house jerk act, it's as old as the first Bad Boys, but not as enjoyable.